Question:
In adults with mental health conditions in secure services who are being discharged into the community, how effective are extensive follow up systems/services, compared to no or minimal follow up systems/services, in reducing re-admittance to inpatient care?
Answer:
Plain language summary
There is limited high quality evidence that demonstrates that
follow up services are effective in reducing re-admittance to
inpatient care. More rigorous research is needed in this area.
Clinical and research implications
One moderate quality and two low quality randomised controlled
trials (RCTs) showed no evidence that continued involuntary
outpatient commitment, a model of integrated care, or a cognitive
behavioural therapy program reduced re-admittance to
inpatient care or prison. Overall, there was a lack of high quality
evidence, particularly with regards to follow-up services in the UK
as the evidence was from RCTs conducted in the USA and
Switzerland.
One RCT recommended that the use of outpatient commitment is not
a substitute for intensive treatment as to be effective it needs a
substantial commitment of treatment resources (Swartz et al.
(1999). The number of re-admissions was not the primary outcome in
any of the RCTs and the follow-up periods may have been too short
to detect differences in admission rates so further research using
follow-up over several years is required. Further research into the
needs of women with mental health conditions in prison is also
needed.
To view the full summary, click the Download Document
link to the right.